?

Log in

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Okay, from Ain't It Cool News via Metafilter we have the 'Raiders of the Lost Ark' Story Conference, which is the original 1978 story conference between George Lucas, Steven Spielberg and Laurence Kasdan where they plotted it out.

Now, I'm sure many people want to talk about the creative process, and screenwriting, and how action films work. Unfortunately, this journal is currently exclusively for talking about sex and food...or so it seems. So I'm just going to quote this bit, on the backstory they initially imagined for Indiana Jones and Marion Ravenwood:

G — I was thinking that this old guy could have been his mentor. He could have known this little girl when she was just a kid. Had an affair with her when she was eleven.

L — And he was forty-two.

G — He hasn't seen her in twelve years. Now she's twenty-two. It's a real strange relationship.

S — She had better be older than twenty-two.

G — He's thirty-five, and he knew her ten years ago when he was twenty-five and she was only twelve. It would be amusing to make her slightly young at the time.

S — And promiscuous. She came onto him.

G — Fifteen is right on the edge. I know it's an outrageous idea, but it is interesting. Once she's sixteen or seventeen it's not interesting anymore. But if she was fifteen and he was twenty-five and they actually had an affair the last time they met. And she was madly in love with him



...........my soul hurts. I'm not sure I have any comment, except that, uh, that was the first thing I shipped! I have fanfiction from when I was 9 lying around somewhere! I saw Crystal Skull three times in the cinema mostly due to my love of their relationship, despite JONESYYYY and certain tacky plot elements and JONESYYYY and the plot not really tying together and JONESYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY.

In any case! They have this dialogue in Raiders of the Lost Ark about how Marion was 'only a child' (her words) when they had the affair and I assumed that meant - emotionally, not actually. Uh, wow. I just....and that they considered eleven and twelve as okay? And used 'promiscuous' and 'affair' to describe a kid and a twenty five year old man? And...and....aaaugh.

Comments

t3h_toby_chan
Mar. 11th, 2009 03:09 am (UTC)
wat
baeckahaesten
Mar. 12th, 2009 10:38 am (UTC)
I DON'T EVEN KNOOOOOW

I WAS A CHILD! IT WAS WRONG AND YOU KNEW IT! <---DIALOGUE NOW FOREVER RUINED FOREVER FOR ME

Honestly I wouldn't say that the actors played it that way remotely and the script doesn't imply it that way necessarily at all so let's have the Jacques Derrida approach re: the actual film.

But...how could they even think that? Three guys! Three mainsteam Hollywood guys! WHAAAAT.
t3h_toby_chan
Mar. 12th, 2009 03:31 pm (UTC)
Maybe they read Lolita and took it at face value that banging 'promiscuous' 12-year-olds is AWWWWRIGHT!


Point. They missed it.

Profile

baeckahaesten
baeckahaesten

Latest Month

August 2011
S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Golly Kim